首页> 外文OA文献 >The ability of MM5 to simulate ice clouds : systematic comparison between simulated and measured fluxes and lidar/radar profiles at the SIRTA atmospheric observatory.
【2h】

The ability of MM5 to simulate ice clouds : systematic comparison between simulated and measured fluxes and lidar/radar profiles at the SIRTA atmospheric observatory.

机译:MM5模拟冰云的能力:SIRTA大气观测站的模拟和实测通量与激光雷达/雷达剖面之间的系统比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The ability of the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) to simulate midlatitude ice clouds is evaluated. Model outputs are compared to long-term meteorological measurements by active (radar and lidar) and passive (infrared and visible fluxes) remote sensing collected at an atmospheric observatory near Paris, France. The goal is to understand which of four microphysical schemes is best suited to simulate midlatitude ice clouds. The methodology consists of simulating instrument observables from the model outputs without any profile inversion, which allows the authors to use fewer assumptions on microphysical and optical properties of ice particles. Among the four schemes compared in the current study, the best observation-to-simulations scores are obtained with Reisner et al. provided that the particles' sedimentation velocity from Heymsfield and Donner is used instead of that originally proposed. For this last scheme, the model gives results close to the measurements for clouds with medium optical depth of typically 1 to 3, whatever the season. In this configuration, MM5 simulates the presence of midlatitude ice clouds in more than 65% of the authors' selection of observed cloud cases. In 35% of the cases, the simulated clouds are too persistent whatever the microphysical scheme and tend to produce too much solid water (ice and snow) and not enough liquid water.
机译:评估了第五代宾夕法尼亚州立大学NCAR中尺度模型(MM5)模拟中纬度冰云的能力。通过在法国巴黎附近的大气观测站收集的主动(雷达和激光雷达)和被动(红外和可见通量)遥感将模型输出与长期气象测量结果进行比较。目的是了解四种微物理方案中最适合模拟中纬度冰云的方案。该方法包括从模型输出中模拟仪器可观察到的东西,而没有任何剖面反转,这使作者可以对冰粒的微物理和光学特性使用较少的假设。在当前研究中比较的四种方案中,Reisner等人获得了最佳的模拟观察分数。前提是使用Heymsfield和Donner的颗粒沉降速度代替最初提出的速度。对于最后一个方案,无论季节如何,模型给出的结果都接近于中等光学深度通常为1到3的云的测量结果。在这种配置下,MM5模拟了中纬度冰云的存在,超过了作者选择的65%观察到的云情况。在35%的情况下,无论采用哪种微物理方案,模拟的云都过于持久,往往会产生过多的固体水(冰和雪)而没有足够的液态水。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号